What’s Worse Than a Tyrannical Leader? One Who Isn’t There
New Study Lists Robert Hogan As One of the Greatest Living Psychologists
THUOPER Developing Colombia’s Next Generation of Leaders
Find, Grow, and Retain Top Talent: A 5-Step Plan
Self-Deception and Leadership
Moral Character Matters, and It Matters Most of All at the Top of Organizations
We Don’t Build Bridges from Instinct: An Interview with Dr. Robert Hogan
Humility, Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness
*This article was originally published by Training Industry on May 1, 2018.
One of the best studies ever conducted on organizational effectiveness was done by Jim Collins and described in his book “Good to Great.” Collins identified 11 firms from the Fortune 1000 that had 15 years of below-average performance in their industry followed by 15 years of above-average performance. The key question of the investigation is, what took these 11 firms from “good” to “great”?
Collins ultimately concluded (somewhat reluctantly) that the key driver of change in organizational performance was a change in leadership. However, simply changing the leadership was not enough. Collins found that these 11 high-performing firms chose leaders with an almost paradoxical blend of characteristics: They were fiercely competitive, yet personally humble.
It is easy to understand why leaders who are fiercely competitive are more effective: They want to beat the competition. What is less clear is why humility – as opposed to confidence, charm and charisma – was characteristic of the most effective leaders. This article draws on recent research in personality science to offer three generalizations about humility, leadership and organizational effectiveness.
Read More »Change Management — How Are We Helping Leaders Change?
*This is a guest post authored by Rob Field, Learning and Development Director at Advanced People Strategies.
We all heard it and probably all rolled our eyes to it...’The only constant is change’. With organisations needing to constantly adapt and evolve due to competitive forces, global challenges or political decisions how are leaders meant to keep up? Development programmes can provide frameworks and information to help create knowledge. We often see comprehensive change programmes with teams of people lead by programme managers. Effective at reviewing processes and creating the project plan and driving timelines to enable delivery. New systems, processes and products emerge. There are the usual statistics that over 80% of change programmes fail. Kotter would say that we need to attend to eight areas with the final of these being anchoring changes firmly in the corporate culture. Read More »